Fasset x SBI Remit. Internal working paper. Not for circulation to SBI Remit
How we reach the numbers. assumptions, ranged
Prepared for Terry, Zarah, Rafi, Jawad
Basis. SBI Remit cost and volume note, Jan to Dec 2025
Status. Draft for Thursday discussion. 28 May 2026
Three deliverables for SBI Remit. regulatory and deposit protection, remittance cost implications, and post-flow card and investment projections. This page shows the assumption bridge behind each, with a conservative to upside range and a ledger of what is known, estimated, or pending confirmation from SBI.
ADeposit protectionRelocated, not removed
The protection today is the performance guarantee deposit lodged with the Legal Affairs Bureau, or a bank or trust guarantee, sized to outstanding transfer obligations. That is the 1.67 bps line.
SBI Remit licence (Type II FTSP, since 2010)No new licence
Stablecoin handling, 2023 PSA amendmentPermitted
JPYSC reserve tier (Shinsei Trust, Type III)Highest
USDC, USDT intermediationJP reserve = custody
In-transit balance under T+0 settlementCompresses
Travel Rule, AML, sanctions screeningUnchanged
Argument. faster settlement shrinks the in-transit balance the guarantee deposit must cover, and trust-segregated reserves sit above the current mechanism. Open. does the MTO licence cover customer-invisible stablecoin flows, does Fasset need a settlement-intermediary registration, where do custody and Travel Rule duties sit. Japan counsel to clear before ship.
BCost implicationsPer year, for all parties
Addressable operating cost is about USD 672k per year on the stated lines. The direct saving is real but modest. the prize is freed capital and a margin defence.
Cost line, annualised
Now
Lever
Saved
Pre-funding
$360k
50 to 70%
$180 to 252k
Guarantee deposit
$240k
20 to 50%
$48 to 120k
Bank spread
$72k
20 to 40%
$14 to 29k
Direct saving [Est]
$240 to 400k
Capital freed to balance sheet [Est]$4 to 18M
Yield on freed capital, USD wrapper at 3 to 4%$0.1 to 0.7M
Combined benefit to SBI Remit [Est]$0.3 to 1.1M / yr
For all parties. SBI Remit. lower unit cost, freed capital, yield, margin defence against Wise, Remitly, Kraken-MoneyGram. Fasset. settlement and routing margin, split with SBI still open, Fasset unit costs high until volume scales. Customer. T+0, access to PK and BD corridors. Headline fee on existing cheap corridors barely moves, SBI already sits below the 5.5% Japan to Vietnam corridor average. Raw USDC pays the holder nothing, the yen leg yields less.
CPost-flow revenueCard and investment, gross
Push products. without active SBI promotion uptake is negligible, so the conservative case is held genuinely low. Pool. active sender base 300 to 500k [Est], from 294k monthly transactions.
Card rev / yr
$0.3M
$2.1M
$9.6M
Avg balance
$300
$800
$2,000
Invest rev / yr
$0.02M
$0.2M
$1.3M
Combined / yr [Est]
$0.3M
$2.3M
$11M
Gross partnership revenue, the Fasset to SBI split is unresolved. LTV logic. a remittance-only customer has low ARPU, the product ladder moves it toward the EM-neobank band, M-Pesa near $21, Revolut near $44, Nubank $67 to 102, supporting a 1.8 to 2.4x lifetime-value uplift [Est].